.gif)
| Entry # | Time | Turn | Player | Title | Entry |
| 96 | 8/14/2026 2:50:00 PM | Turn 1 | Mark Gutfreund | Message |
T16 Repl: 106 Pz (2), 6/3 para (1), 2 saved |
| 95 | 8/14/2026 2:27:00 PM | Turn 1 | Mark Gutfreund | Message |
4=DB2 to T27 |
| 94 | 8/14/2026 2:26:00 PM | Turn 1 | Mark Gutfreund | Die roll request |
Request: 6-sided die x 1 4 Message from Mark Gutfreund: 4=DB2=DE 5-1 vs 17LW |
| 93 | 8/14/2026 2:25:00 PM | Turn 1 | Mark Gutfreund | Die roll request |
Request: 6-sided die x 1 4 Message from Mark Gutfreund: T16: 3-1 vs Lehr |
| 92 | 8/14/2026 11:36:00 AM | Turn 1 | Scott Goehring | Message |
sending you a revised log file in a moment. |
| 91 | 8/14/2026 11:35:00 AM | Turn 1 | Scott Goehring | Message |
Attack #1 is now cancelled. The four units I landed in what I thought was a second wave have now all been returned off board to their force pool. Attack #2 (a 5-1) and attack #3 (a 3-1) are still a go. |
| 90 | 8/13/2026 5:51:00 PM | Turn 1 | Scott Goehring | Message |
3 attacks, all need die rolls. Attack #1 is an invasion: 5 armor and 79 inf with 1 factor of CAS vs static unit 719. 10-2 becomes a 5-1. If DB2, retreat to O23. Both attackers must advance on all results. Attack #2 is 4 armor, 80 inf, 29 inf, Po armor, and Br 50 inf vs static unit 17LW. 22-4 becomes a 5-1. If DB2, retreat to T27. Adv 29 inf and Po arm on all results. Attack #3 is a 3-1 surrounded. 7 adjacent attacking units vs Lehr 5-5-4. 30-10 is a 3-1. If D Elim or DB2 (also an Elim), please advance Br 7 arm and Fr 3 inf into Dijon. If an exchange, then remove the 2 5-5-4s and advance both Fr infantry units. |
| 89 | 8/13/2026 5:46:00 PM | Turn 1 | Scott Goehring | Message |
This will be Allied Turn 16. An 8th replacement factor arrives, this time I will spend 5 points to return a 5-5-4 armor factor to the inventory. That allows me to save 3 factors. All Allied units begin Turn 16 in supply. Begin this turn with beach hex Dieppe also controlled and providing the last 2 points needed for supply this turn. Following combat this turn, beach hexes P26 and O25 will also be in control and defended. There are 3 attacks, see next window for details. |
| 88 | 8/13/2026 2:15:00 PM | Turn 1 | Mark Gutfreund | Message |
Pretty easy choice there: DE and AE. |
| 87 | 8/13/2026 2:15:00 PM | Turn 1 | Mark Gutfreund | Die roll request |
Request: 6-sided die x 2 1 6 Message from Mark Gutfreund: 2-1 vs 25ss |
| 86 | 8/13/2026 11:28:00 AM | Turn 1 | Scott Goehring | Message |
This will be Allied Turn 15. This will be the 7th consecutive turn that I have received one replacement point. All 7 have been saved so far. I will make a second invasion on Turn (15) in the Pas De Calais. All Allied units begin Turn 15 in supply. I will also use the optional naval bombardment rule with this invasion. There will be 4 attacks. 3 of them will be AV's: (5-1 surrounded vs. 116 Panzer, 7-1 vs. 7 HQ, and 7-1 vs. 9 Panzer). The only die rolls needed will be for the 2-1 against Dieppe, which includes the use of the optional naval bombardment, so please roll two dice for that 2-1 battle. P27 are invasion forces plus 1 factor of CAS. Q28 are two armor units attacking from the land side. It turns out I could NOT get a 3-1 against Dieppe. I was thinking the Turn 16 armor was available for my invasion, but half way through the move it dawned on me that they were not and I could not achieve a 3-1. Since I already let the cat out of the bag, I altered it to the 2-1 with naval gunfire support this Turn (Turn 15). |
| 85 | 8/12/2026 3:29:00 PM | Turn 1 | Mark Gutfreund | Message |
6=DE |
| 84 | 8/12/2026 3:29:00 PM | Turn 1 | Mark Gutfreund | Die roll request |
Request: 6-sided die x 1 6 Message from Mark Gutfreund: 3-1 vs 165 |
| 83 | 8/12/2026 11:51:00 AM | Turn 1 | Scott Goehring | Message |
6 air units assigned interdiction. End Allied Turn 14. |
| 82 | 8/12/2026 11:47:00 AM | Turn 1 | Scott Goehring | Message |
Allied Turn 14 combat, you only need one die roll. Attack vs. 15 HQ is a 7-1 AV. Attack vs. 5 para is a 5-1 surrounded AV. Attack vs. 165 static is a 3-1. If D Elim, advance 1 inf. If DB2, retreat to KK29, advance 1 inf. If Exch, remove Fr 1 inf, adv US 1 inf. |
| 81 | 8/12/2026 11:21:00 AM | Turn 1 | Scott Goehring | Message |
Turn 13 combat results were unfortunate. This will be Allied Turn 14. This will be the 6th consecutive turn that I have received one replacement point. All 6 have been saved so far. I DO NOT intend to invade this Turn (14). If I am going to use the second invasion, I must do so either next turn (15), or the following turn (16). All Allied units begin Turn 14 in supply. |
| 80 | 7/23/2026 10:12:00 AM | Turn 1 | Mark Gutfreund | Message |
5-1, 719 retreats 1-3=AE |
| 79 | 7/23/2026 10:07:00 AM | Turn 1 | Mark Gutfreund | Die roll request |
Request: 6-sided die x 2 4 6 Message from Mark Gutfreund: 1. 5-1 vs 719 2. 1-3 vs 1sspz |
| 78 | 7/22/2026 4:16:00 PM | Turn 1 | Scott Goehring | Message |
There were 2 CAS and 4 interdiction markers placed. |
| 77 | 7/22/2026 4:12:00 PM | Turn 1 | Scott Goehring | Message |
I will only need die rolls for Attacks 1 (5-1) and 2 (1-3) |
| 76 | 7/22/2026 4:11:00 PM | Turn 1 | Scott Goehring | Message |
Attacks 3 and 4 are AVs: Attack #3 is a 7-1 AV. Hexes X29 and W29 vs static unit 157. 18-2 or 9-1 is an AV. No advance possible. Attack #4 Br 6 arm, Br 7 arm, and Fr 1 inf vs 6/2 para. 14-2 or 7-1 AV. Fr 1 Inf advances to Vichy. |
| 75 | 7/22/2026 4:06:00 PM | Turn 1 | Scott Goehring | Message |
I accidentally interupted the verbiage in the previous block inserting the last sentence in the middle of the second last sentence. That attack was a 1-3 soak off. |
| 74 | 7/22/2026 4:04:00 PM | Turn 1 | Scott Goehring | Message |
Attack #1 is a 5-1: 80 inf, Po arm, and 1 CAS point vs Static unit 719. 10-2 or 5-1. DB2=Y28. No advance possible. Attack #2 Fr 2 inf with 1 factor of CAS vs 1ssPanzer. 2 more attacks in the next fox. =5-14 is a 1-3 soak off. AB is up to you. |
| 73 | 7/22/2026 3:56:00 PM | Turn 1 | Scott Goehring | Message |
This is my Allied Turn 13. No Invasion This turn either. One replacement saved this turn makes a total of 5 saved. Combat will begin in the next block. I believe I have 4 attacks. |
| 72 | 7/22/2026 9:30:00 AM | Turn 1 | Mark Gutfreund | Message |
DE |
| 71 | 7/22/2026 9:29:00 AM | Turn 1 | Mark Gutfreund | Die roll request |
Request: 6-sided die x 1 5 Message from Mark Gutfreund: T12: 5-1 vs EE29 HQ |
| 70 | 7/21/2026 10:58:00 PM | Turn 1 | Scott Goehring | Message |
No Invasion this turn. Two attacks this turn. Can't pass up the fort/port. The first is a 7-1 AV: Po armor, 4 armor, and 80 inf (14 factors) vs static unit 343 (2 factors). 14-2 = 7-1 = AV. No advance possible. The second attack is two 5-5-4s in FF30 vs 0-1-4 HQ unit B in EE29. 5-1. If DB2, retreat to FF28. No advance. If D ELim -- NO advance. |
| 69 | 7/21/2026 10:50:00 PM | Turn 1 | Scott Goehring | Message |
This is Allied Turn 12. Had 2 reinforcement points saved, gain one more for a total of 3 reinforcement points now banked. |
| 68 | 7/21/2026 5:37:00 AM | Turn 1 | Mark Gutfreund | Message |
2=Db2 to X28 |
| 67 | 7/21/2026 5:36:00 AM | Turn 1 | Mark Gutfreund | Die roll request |
Request: 6-sided die x 1 2 Message from Mark Gutfreund: T11, 5-1 |
| 66 | 7/20/2026 6:53:00 PM | Turn 1 | Scott Goehring | Message |
Allied Turn 11. Mostly a turn of maneuver. THERE IS NO INVASION THIS TURN. There is ONE attack -- a 10-2 = 5-1 Hex X30 vs hex W29. 5-1. If D Elim, no advance. If D Back 2, retreat to X28 and again, no advance. |
| 65 | 7/19/2026 11:18:00 AM | Turn 1 | Mark Gutfreund | Message |
DE; you haven't had many of those |
| 64 | 7/19/2026 11:16:00 AM | Turn 1 | Mark Gutfreund | Die roll request |
Request: 6-sided die x 1 1 Message from Mark Gutfreund: T10: 3-1 vs 275 |
| 63 | 7/18/2026 4:49:00 PM | Turn 1 | Scott Goehring | Message |
This is Allied Turn 10. There is ONE attack needing a die roll: 6 adjacent units vs 275 inf. 25-8 = 3-1 If D Elim: advance 9 and 35 inf. If D Back 2: retreat to U28, advance 9 and 35 inf. If Exch: remove 9 and 35 inf, advance 4 armor. I hope I got everything that was lost the first time. |
| 62 | 7/18/2026 4:45:00 PM | Turn 1 | Scott Goehring | Message |
I have now moved through all the Bay of Biscay coastal hexes. I placed 6 tactical aircraft all flying interdiction. |
| 61 | 7/18/2026 4:44:00 PM | Turn 1 | Scott Goehring | Message |
Augh -- the page timed out and now I have to retype everything! No Invasion this turn. Both airborne units return to England. One more replacement point is added, 2 are now banked. |
| 60 | 7/17/2026 3:47:00 PM | Turn 1 | Scott Goehring | Message |
Allied T9. First turn Allies receive replacements, save one replacement factor. Only 1 attack -- it is a 5-1 surrounded so an AV. 348 static unit eliminated (please remove it during your next turn). Advance both airborne units to Cherbourg. 1 air factor of close support, 5 interdiction markers. Over to you |
| 59 | 7/17/2026 12:54:00 PM | Turn 1 | Scott Goehring | Message |
Rules Questions: 1. If I move units into Caan and Bayeux, and follow those up with a HQ into each, then that should give me 10 supply points (5+5)to any unit within 8 hexes come my next turn, correct? 2. I would like to attack Cherbourg. I can easily get several stacks of ground units out into that end of the peninsula. Can I also drop airborne units into Q33 and Q35 using rule 18.1? The extra 6 factors would allow me to reach a 5-1 and avoid an exchange. And then I could move into Cherbourg next turn and return them to England. Rule 2.11) defines a coastal port as any coastal hex containing a city of fortress. Carentan seems to meet that requirement, but it has no red value pointing to it. Is it a coastal port and if so, what value does it have? Standing by Thanks Scott |
| 58 | 7/16/2026 1:24:00 PM | Turn 1 | Scott Goehring | Message |
Scott's Allied Turn 8. My big challenge was to use strategic movement and make sure I had enough HQ units ashore to supply everybody. I think I JUST got there, but had to shift two or three pieces back a few hexes to make it work (forgot I had to supply the HQ units too). I have 6 HQ units ashore in three stacks of two. That lets me reach 16 hexes and lets me supply 26 divisions. And the polish tank unit is sitting in a port -- so that gets me to 27. How am I supposed to make these supply lines reach Germany? 24 hexes is not enough, is it? Over to you. |
| 57 | 7/16/2026 8:45:00 AM | Turn 1 | Mark Gutfreund | Message |
Ab2 to Z41 |
| 56 | 7/16/2026 8:44:00 AM | Turn 1 | Mark Gutfreund | Die roll request |
Request: 6-sided die x 1 3 Message from Mark Gutfreund: 1-2 vs 3ss pz gr |
| 55 | 7/15/2026 12:06:00 PM | Turn 1 | Scott Goehring | Message |
Allied Turn 7 attacks, there are two: First attack is a 7-1 AV vs 51ss Panzer. Attacking units are: US 6 arm, Br 51 inf, Br 7 arm, US 1 inf, and Br 6 arm. 23-3 is a 7-1 AV. No advance possible. No need for a die roll. 2nd Attack is a 1-2 vs 3ss. Attacker is Fr 1 Inf with CAS support. 5-10 = 1-2. If DB2: retreat 3ss to Z38, Adv Fr 1. If Exch: both eliminated, no advance possible. A Back 2 -- retreat is up to you. That's it for Allied T7 attacks. |
| 54 | 7/14/2026 5:40:00 PM | Turn 1 | Mark Gutfreund | Die roll request |
Request: 6-sided die x 1 3 Message from Mark Gutfreund: 1-1 vs 51ss |
| 53 | 7/14/2026 9:00:00 AM | Turn 1 | Mark Gutfreund | Message |
EXCH - a lot of casualties for both of us in this game |
| 52 | 7/14/2026 9:00:00 AM | Turn 1 | Mark Gutfreund | Die roll request |
Request: 6-sided die x 1 2 Message from Mark Gutfreund: Allied T6: 1-1 vs AA40 |
| 51 | 7/13/2026 1:21:00 PM | Turn 1 | Scott Goehring | Message |
2 Attacks: All Units in hex Z40 attack all units in hex AA40 along with one CAS factor. 5+4+1=10, 4+6=10. 10-10 equals 1-1. Exch should be everybody. D Elim clears the hex with no advance possible. D Back 2 = CC41 with no advance possible. A Back 2 is up to you but I think they have to go to Y41. Attack #2 is all units in hex Z41 with one factor of CAS against Hex AA41. 4+4+1=9, 3 tripled=9. 9-9 = 1-1. D Elim, both attackers advance to AA41. Exch is everybody. D Back 2 = CC40, adv both attackers. A Back 2 is up to you but I believe they have to go to Y42. You continue to try to save me from myself every time I do something stupid with my airborne. I'm not sure this is any better but at least they are safe in England! |
| 50 | 7/13/2026 12:57:00 PM | Turn 1 | Scott Goehring | Message |
Re do of Allied Turn 6 combat due to my error in determining what units could and could not retreat/advance. |
| 49 | 7/13/2026 10:21:00 AM | Turn 1 | Mark Gutfreund | Message |
Scott: In your attack, neither 2ss pz or 11th pz are surrounded because the river negates the Br 6 para's ZOC. I am pretty sure you may not want to risk this attack because you don't have a surround, so I will let you do that. If you can get me out of that AA40, you should have a breakout and I will be on the run. |
| 48 | 7/12/2026 6:36:00 PM | Turn 1 | Scott Goehring | Message |
First Battle is a 1-2 with US 95th Inf vs 2SS panzer. 4-6 turns into a 1-2, surrounded. An Exch will kill both of our units. No advance possible. A DB2 result will destroy 2SS Panzer, again no advance. An AB2 is up to you. 2nd battle is a 3-1 surrounded vs 11 Panzer. Br 1 para, Br 6 para, and Br 6 Armor with CAS support, vs 11 Panzer. 3+3+5+1 = 12-4 or 3-1 surrounded. DB is an Elim, Exch removes your unit and Br 6 Armor. No advance after any combat possible. Roll away. |
| 47 | 7/12/2026 6:27:00 PM | Turn 1 | Scott Goehring | Message |
Trying more new things with this Turn 6 Allied Move. I am going to drop two British airborne units into hexes BB40 and BB41. Since I am behind the river, neither of these units should be in your ZOC, even though I would be allowed to drop them into your ZOC if that was needed. |
| 46 | 7/11/2026 2:31:00 PM | Turn 1 | Scott Goehring | Message |
This is the Allied T5. Only one combat this turn and it is an AV, so no reason to roll and no advance after combat due to the hex not being doubled or tripled. 4 adjacent units vs 106 Pz. Please remove that eliminated unit when you get the .vlog file. |
| 45 | 7/11/2026 12:38:00 PM | Turn 1 | Mark Gutfreund | Message |
DB2, which is D elim; vs 2 pz, EXCH |
| 44 | 7/11/2026 12:37:00 PM | Turn 1 | Mark Gutfreund | Die roll request |
Request: 6-sided die x 2 1 2 Message from Mark Gutfreund: 1-2 vs 3 para 1-2 vs 2nd pz |
| 43 | 7/11/2026 12:35:00 PM | Turn 1 | Mark Gutfreund | Message |
One thing on advancing after combat: only possible is the defending unit is doubled or tripled by the terrain. |
| 42 | 7/10/2026 1:35:00 PM | Turn 1 | Scott Goehring | Message |
Allied T4, 3 Attacks: Attack #1: Br 51 Inf and US 28 inf vs 3 para; 8-15 is a 1-2. DB2 is an elim, advance BR 51 to V43. Exch is everybody. AB2 is up to you. Attack #2: Br 52 Inf vs 2 Panzer; 4-7 is a 1-2. DB2 = BB41 advance Br 52 inf to Z41. Exch is everybody. AB2 is up to you. Attack #3 is an AV. 4 armor, 6 armor, and Br 7 armor vs OB West HQ. 15-1 is a 7-1 is an AV. ONLY advance Br 7 armor if Br 52 inf has already gotten a Db2 and advanced to Z41. 4 and 6 armor do NOT advance no matter the results. Roll awy. log file coming shortly. |
| 41 | 7/10/2026 9:34:00 AM | Turn 1 | Mark Gutfreund | Message |
But now you can supply 22 units |
| 40 | 7/10/2026 9:32:00 AM | Turn 1 | Mark Gutfreund | Message |
Some bad luck: ex vs 21st pz; Db2 for 2ss |
| 39 | 7/10/2026 9:28:00 AM | Turn 1 | Mark Gutfreund | Die roll request |
Request: 6-sided die x 2 5 1 Message from Mark Gutfreund: 3-1, then 1-2 |
| 38 | 7/9/2026 1:02:00 PM | Turn 1 | Scott Goehring | Message |
This message is for the Allied Redo of T3. The Allies have 2 attacks. Attack #1 is 7 5-5-4 armor units with one unit getting CAS for a total of 36 vs 21 Panzer (tripled). 7 X 5 + 1 CAS point = 36 vs 4 tripled = 36-12 = 3-1 An Exchange will be too painful to consider Take Br 79, Br 11, and US 2 armor. Advance 3 armor. A DB2 = D Elim. For either D ELim or D Back 2 advance 2 and 3 armor. The other attack is BR 52 inf vs 2ss at 1-2. DB2 = AA41, no advance. Exch is all. |
| 37 | 7/9/2026 8:06:00 AM | Turn 1 | Mark Gutfreund | Message |
1-3, 2=AB2 to U41 3-1, EX, take 8 inf and German 352 |
| 36 | 7/9/2026 8:02:00 AM | Turn 1 | Mark Gutfreund | Die roll request |
Request: 6-sided die x 2 2 2 Message from Mark Gutfreund: 1. 1-3 2. 3-1 |
| 35 | 7/8/2026 3:23:00 PM | Turn 1 | Scott Goehring | Message |
Re Do German T3 attacks: 2 Battles Battle #1 is Br 51 Inf plus CAS vs 116 pz, 21 Pz, and 2 Pz. 5-15 or 1-3. Battle #2 is 51 Inf with CAS, 8 Inf, and Br 7 armor vs 352 inf. 14-4 or 3-1. Ex = 8 Inf. DB2 = W38. Roll away! |
| 34 | 7/7/2026 10:56:00 AM | Turn 1 | Scott Goehring | Message |
So you changed your mind. Are you waiting for something from me? |
| 33 | 7/7/2026 8:48:00 AM | Turn 1 | Mark Gutfreund | Message |
I changed my mind - check my work before I do the move. |
| 32 | 7/7/2026 8:46:00 AM | Turn 1 | Mark Gutfreund | Message |
Brest to Ab2: per board Lorient: AE I will just go ahead with my move here |
| 31 | 7/7/2026 8:43:00 AM | Turn 1 | Mark Gutfreund | Die roll request |
Request: 6-sided die x 2 3 6 Message from Mark Gutfreund: #1 vs Brest #2 vs Lorient |
| 30 | 7/6/2026 3:54:00 PM | Turn 1 | Scott Goehring | Message |
Two attacks, both 1-2. Battle #1: 1 Inf and 28 Inf vs. Brest. 8-15 which is a 1-2. Exch eliminates all. DB2 = Elim, advance 1 inf into V43. Battle #2: Armor Div in W42 with Close Air Support vs Lorient. 6-12 = 1-2. |
| 29 | 7/6/2026 1:28:00 PM | Turn 1 | Mark Gutfreund | Message |
sorry, AE |
| 28 | 7/6/2026 1:28:00 PM | Turn 1 | Mark Gutfreund | Die roll request |
Request: 6-sided die x 1 5 Message from Mark Gutfreund: 1-2 v 3 para |
| 27 | 7/6/2026 12:37:00 PM | Turn 1 | Scott Goehring | Message |
I also allocated 3 close air support units to Defensive CAP. |
| 26 | 7/6/2026 12:36:00 PM | Turn 1 | Scott Goehring | Message |
I did not drop my remaining airborne unit. I did land 2 more inf divs and 2 armor divs. 1 combat -- 4 Inf and 29 inf vs your para unit in V43. Attack is 8-15 or 1-2. Exch will be all three units with no advance possible. DB2 = D Elim, advance 4 inf to V43. AB2 is up to you. |
| 25 | 7/6/2026 8:53:00 AM | Turn 1 | Mark Gutfreund | Message |
OK sorry for confusion; 82nd to W43 No file, so your Allied T2 You are shore, at least, now troops arrivng, but long road to the Rhine. I also probably would have invaded here, but only use 1 paratrooper. But the 82nd will live to fight another day at least |
| 24 | 7/5/2026 5:01:00 PM | Turn 1 | Scott Goehring | Message |
OK -- figured out where the dead pile is so that is fixed. So all I now need is to know who is advancing and to where; and where to retreat the 82nd airborne. |
| 23 | 7/5/2026 4:48:00 PM | Turn 1 | Scott Goehring | Message |
Standing Bye for your response |
| 22 | 7/5/2026 4:46:00 PM | Turn 1 | Scott Goehring | Message |
No advance after combat. Need your help with some things. Where do I put eliminated units? For now I have your 84th Inf and my 101st airborne in the ocean By the label for Brittany. It looks like we both forgot retreat and exchange data for different battles. |
| 21 | 7/5/2026 4:41:00 PM | Turn 1 | Scott Goehring | Message |
Oh -- had forgotten that 1-1s are bad on this CRT. A Elim |
| 20 | 7/5/2026 4:41:00 PM | Turn 1 | Scott Goehring | Die roll request |
Request: 6-sided die x 1 5 Message from Scott Goehring: Die roll for 1-1 |
| 19 | 7/5/2026 4:40:00 PM | Turn 1 | Scott Goehring | Message |
Battle 3. is a 1-1: |
| 18 | 7/5/2026 4:39:00 PM | Turn 1 | Scott Goehring | Message |
a 3 is a D Back 2: No idea where you want to retreat the 82nd to. |
| 17 | 7/5/2026 4:37:00 PM | Turn 1 | Scott Goehring | Die roll request |
Request: 6-sided die x 1 3 Message from Scott Goehring: 2. 3-1 |
| 16 | 7/5/2026 4:36:00 PM | Turn 1 | Scott Goehring | Message |
Attack 2. is actually an 11-3 which is a 3-1, not a 5-1 |
| 15 | 7/5/2026 4:34:00 PM | Turn 1 | Scott Goehring | Message |
I assume you wanted to advance both 4-4-4s into the hex. |
| 14 | 7/5/2026 4:27:00 PM | Turn 1 | Scott Goehring | Message |
Battle 1. Result D Back2 = D Elim due to surrounded. 101 to dead pile |
| 13 | 7/5/2026 4:25:00 PM | Turn 1 | Scott Goehring | Die roll request |
Request: 6-sided die x 1 4 Message from Scott Goehring: Die Roll for 1. 3-1 surrounded. |
| 12 | 7/5/2026 4:25:00 PM | Turn 1 | Scott Goehring | Message |
German T1 3 attacks: |
| 11 | 7/5/2026 3:24:00 PM | Turn 1 | Mark Gutfreund | Message |
Scott: I don't think I need any more explanation than that: whose attacking who, retreat routes, who to take in an EX |
| 10 | 7/5/2026 3:22:00 PM | Turn 1 | Mark Gutfreund | Message |
Three attacks: 1. 21pz, 116pz, 1ss pz vs 101, 15-4, or 3-1, DR=DE 2. 2pz, 352 inf vs 82nd @5-1; DR to W43 3. 84 vs 1st inf @1-1 |
| 9 | 7/5/2026 3:05:00 PM | Turn 1 | Mark Gutfreund | Message |
You didn't say what unit you would lose in an EX, so I took 2nd inf |
| 8 | 7/5/2026 3:03:00 PM | Turn 1 | Mark Gutfreund | Die roll request |
Request: 6-sided die x 1 2 Message from Mark Gutfreund: #2 at 4-1 |
| 7 | 7/5/2026 3:02:00 PM | Turn 1 | Mark Gutfreund | Die roll request |
Request: 6-sided die x 1 2 Message from Mark Gutfreund: 4-1 vs 16LW |
| 6 | 7/4/2026 1:52:00 PM | Turn 1 | Scott Goehring | Message |
Invading Brittany. 4-4-4s placed in U39, T39, T40, and T41 (all sea hexes). Airborne drop next in X41 and W41. T41 unit moves to U42; T40 unit to U41; and T39 unit to U40. Naval Gunfire counter to U39 to support battle from U39 Close Air Support counter to X41 vs W40. Interdiction markers on BB40 and AA41 and N9. 2 airpower counters being held for results of combat. 2 attacks: 1 inf (with naval gunfire support) and 2 inf (8 factors) vs 16LW (2 factors) at 4-1 surrounded. Second battle is both airborne units plus 1 close Air Support factor for a total of 7 vs 1 HQ. 7-1 should yield an AV. |
| 5 | 7/3/2026 12:27:00 PM | Turn 1 | Scott Goehring | Message |
A 6 at 3-1 would have been a D Elim |
| 4 | 7/3/2026 12:26:00 PM | Turn 1 | Scott Goehring | Die roll request |
Request: 6-sided die x 1 6 Message from Scott Goehring: 3 - 1 |
| 3 | 7/3/2026 12:25:00 PM | Turn 1 | Scott Goehring | Message |
Testing to see how to send messages. Notionally I would enter the combat data here 2 paras (6) + 3 infs (12) vs a tripled static division (6) yields an 18 - 6 or 3 - 1. Requesting Die Roll: |
| 2 | 7/3/2026 11:15:00 AM | Turn 1 | Scott Goehring | Die roll request |
Request: 6-sided die x 1 5 Message from Scott Goehring: Test to see if I can generate a die roll |
| 1 | 7/3/2026 9:03:00 AM | Turn 1 | Mark Gutfreund | Message |
OK Scott I have setup our game on ACTS, so you should be getting this message in your email. |
Copyright 2005 Warhorse Simulations